The Final Report
The Medina Sheriff's Office Releases its Final Report on the Case 110 Explosion
January/February 2002
Richard Backus
Members of the steam hobby have been holding their collective
breath since the tragic explosion of Cliff Kovicic's Case 110
at the Medina County Fairgrounds on July 29, 2001. Initial reports
on the precise cause of the explosion were confusing at best, and
now, with the Oct. 5, 2001 release of the Medina County
Sheriff's final report, hope that any confusion surrounding the
tragic accident would be laid to rest has been, in some measure,
extinguished.
RELATED CONTENT
Eastern Shore Threshermen & Collectors Association Show...
Northwest Pennsylvania Steam Engine and Old Equipment Association...
Oxen were used to snake logs for the Saw Mill and to turn the Horse power''...
Eastern Shore Threshermen & Collectors Association Show...
Gonnerman engine I found on my vacation at Fredericktown, Missouri''...
The Medina County Sheriff's final report states its
conclusion simply: 'It is obvious from physical examination,
photographs, and testing, along with computer generated stress
analysis conducted on the stay bolts and crown sheet fastening
points, that ninety plus years of corrosion and erosion had taken
its toll on this boiler.' If Medina Sheriff Neil F. Hassinger
was trying to quell further discussion on what caused the July 29
explosion with this statement, he doubtless failed to that end.
Primarily, this is because of strong sentiment in many circles
that even a weak boiler, if properly tended and its water level
kept up, will not fail in the cataclysmic fashion as experienced in
Medina. This is not to suggest that anyone within the steam
community would suggest in any way that any owner/operator should
run a steam engine in less than a safe operating condition - the
truth is quite the opposite. The steam community is universal in
its embrace of the need for greater considerations of safety when
operating steam engines and the attendant need for owners/operators
to have their equipment properly tested and inspected to ensure its
safe operation. What appears to be the greatest bone of contention
is the idea that Kovicic's Case, simply due to its age, was
inherently unsafe at any operating pressure and that, by extension,
all antique boilers are unsafe at any operating pressure.
More Details
While some sources have said that Kovicic's Case 110 was of
1918 vintage (this date appears in the 'General Details'
section of the final report), serial number dating shows that
engine number 20753 was constructed sometime between 1908 and 1909.
This is also the date that appears through most of the final
report, and it appears that any confusion surrounding the
Case's date of manufacture stems from dating the boiler number
(9487) versus the engine number.
A diagram from the Medina Sheriff's Office final report on
the Case 110 explosion, detailing the progression of the crown
sheet as it collapsed and then propelled itself in a downward
fashion. The energy released from the explosion has been estimated
at 330,000 foot-pounds.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Next >>